• Home
  • Blog
  • News
  • Events
  • About the Author
  • About the Book
  • Bookstore
  • Reviews
  • Press/Media
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Blog
  • News
  • Events
  • About the Author
  • About the Book
  • Bookstore
  • Reviews
  • Press/Media
  • Contact
D.R. Ranshaw

D.R. RANSHAW

The Purist's Plea

6/27/2015

1 Comment

 
I’m a bit of a purist.

Well, okay, I’m actually a major purist. That’s today’s literary confession out of the way. You know, that which the Master hath penned, let no one put asunder, and all that.

Last entry, I briefly made reference to “Tolkien’s or Jackson’s versions of Middle Earth,” and a friend queried that statement. Two versions? Whatever was I talking about? To which I began my response by giving him The Look. (Generations of my students are very familiar with The Look. In fact, once, after I had just given one miscreant The Look, I let it sit there for one endlessly silent moment, and in that moment, one of my more astute scholars whispered clearly, for all to hear, “Incoming!”) What had my friend done to deserve The Look? Well, plainly, he Had Not Read The Master’s Words, only seen the films. Which, dear reader, I’m informing you right now, is a heinous sin. When there’s a book in existence before the film version, Thou Shalt Always Read The Book Before Seeing The Film so that, at the least, you can see what the author intended before Hollywood gets its claws into the material. I’m constantly telling my scholars that just because they’ve seen the film version, it does not mean they’ve as good as read the book. Not even close. In fact, sometimes, what winds up on the screen bears only a passing, tortured resemblance to what the author originally penned. (Doesn’t anyone wonder why the opening credits will say, ‘based on the book by’ so-and-so?) And sometimes that passing resemblance is truly horrendous. Let me give you an example that has nothing to do with Jackson or Tolkien.

When I first began teaching George Orwell’s Animal Farm to the masses way back in the Dark Ages, I cast around for a film version (because --- sigh --- my imaginatively challenged little charges hungered for something visual; more on that later). At that time, there was only an animated version out there, so I obtained it and we watched it. I hated it with the white-hot intensity of a thousand suns. Why?

Because they changed Orwell’s brilliant ending. No, that’s incorrect: they mangled it, destroyed it, killed the entire point the great man was trying to make.

If you’ve read the book --- and if you haven’t, you should, because it’s neither a long nor a difficult read, but is elegant and brilliant in its storytelling --- you’ll know that it ends (spoiler alert) on a truly hopeless note: the pigs who were to guide the rest of the animals into a new, golden era have become so intoxicated and corrupted by the exercise of absolute power (thank you, Lord Acton) that they have become indistinguishable from the awful humans they replaced. The book accurately and masterfully reflects the massive political and social betrayal of the people by Stalin’s USSR in the early 1940s, as Orwell intended.

But the cartoon version, made in 1954 in Britain with American funding (Wikipedia asserts that it was CIA funding, which would certainly explain a great deal), changes the ending so that the animals rise up against their new oppressors, thereby triumphantly proving that tyranny cannot stand against truth, justice and the American way. Which, as I said, completely destroys the point Orwell was making.

Now, fortunately, Jackson didn’t eviscerate Tolkien quite to that degree. At least, not with LOTR. We can talk about The Hobbit some other time. A time when I’m feeling emotionally much stronger. But when I discuss Tolkien with my students, I’m very clear with them that J.R.R. Tolkien’s Middle Earth and Peter Jackson’s Middle Earth are not the same place at all. At all. The late, great movie critic Roger Ebert summed up my thoughts on this issue very eloquently in his review when the first LOTR film came out in December of 2001. (Go to http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/lord-of-the-rings-the-fellowship-of-the-ring-2001 to read the full review.)

Jackson changed all sorts of things. To be fair, some of those changes I could understand. For example, along with many others, I deeply mourned the omission of Tom Bombadil from the film version, but I could understand it, because, enormously entertaining and wonderful as that particular episode is, it really doesn’t do a lot to advance the plot --- not directly, that is, although it does perform other functions which we can talk about another time --- and even in an extended movie edition of three and a half hours and counting, we’re on a bit of a tight timeline here.

Other changes I had a lot more difficulty with. Not all. Some changes were, actually, pretty good (proving the old adage that there’s always an exception to every rule). But some changes really altered the tone and intention of what Professor Tolkien had intended, similar to changing the end of Animal Farm, and it took me a long time to be able to appreciate the Jackson films on their own merits, and to be able to make that distinction in my mind between the celluloid and cellulose versions. (Some of those changes I still struggle with.)

Now, all of this may leave you wondering aloud, so what? (To which I give you Arthur C. Clarke’s famous rebuttal: ‘Shut up, he explained.’) But in this increasingly visually oriented society which seems hopelessly addicted to, as Ebert said, tales that “instinctively ramp up to the genre of the overwrought special-effects action picture,” I do make an appeal for you to at least look at, and hopefully appreciate, the written words of an author. Is the written word dead, or dying? Gosh, I sure hope not. Because coupled with a vibrant and fertile imagination, it has the power to transform worlds.

By way of concluding, and speaking of the power of the printed word, the same friend I mentioned at the beginning of this entry, having evidently not learned from receiving The Look, made reference to the “literary house” metaphor I made in my very first blog entry.  “Where’s the complaints department?” he demanded jokingly. At least, I think he was joking.

“Why, in the basement, of course,” I replied sweetly, without missing a beat. “Just look for the door with the inscription that says, ‘abandon all hope, ye who enter here.’ Knock and walk straight in. At your own peril, of course.”

He looked at me narrowly, but I think he understood that, no, I wasn’t joking.

1 Comment
Anne Duguay
6/27/2015 02:38:52 pm

Oh Brilliant words as always! Film adaptations are most often a pale imitation of the book ("Dune" I'm looking at you!). I sincerely hope that your little scholars take your words to heart - I'm always asking them "and have you read the book?". I have to admit -I quite enjoyed Jackson's version of LOTR's...just didn't always match up with the movie in my head from reading the books :).

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    D.R. Ranshaw's Blog

    Copyright 2015-2025. All rights reserved.
    ​
    Author of The Annals of Arrinor series.  Lover of great literature, fine wine, and chocolate. Not necessarily in that order.

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly