• Home
  • Blog
  • News
  • Events
  • About the Author
  • About the Book
  • Bookstore
  • Reviews
  • Press/Media
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Blog
  • News
  • Events
  • About the Author
  • About the Book
  • Bookstore
  • Reviews
  • Press/Media
  • Contact
D.R. Ranshaw

D.R. RANSHAW

Poor Yorick!

5/22/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Let’s talk today about murdering your darlings. No, not your words, as Sir Arthur Quiller Couch meant when he wrote that phrase, but your characters.
 
As writers, we all know you need to make your readers invested in your characters in order to have a successful tale i.e. one that people will want to read. People need to identify with your protagonist, feel his/her tribulations, rejoice with him/her in the high moments, suffer with him/her through the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, and in general care about the character. And not just the protagonist, either. Readers need to identify with the supporting characters, too, caring about them only marginally less than the protagonist.
 
Particularly if you intend to kill them off. Perhaps especially if you intend to kill them off, I’ve decided.
 
Okay... and what has prompted this strange observation? I hear you asking. Well, the other day, I was talking with one of my literature classes about good and evil, heroes and villains. We paused to examine a J.K. Rowling interview where she spoke about some of her thoughts on the matter, and in the course of that interview she mentioned Cedric Digory and his untimely end in Goblet of Fire. She felt that the death was so shocking that she wanted to be there when her then-young daughter first read the passage in question. Funny thing was, her daughter was not, apparently, all that upset by the death. And neither were my scholars. In fact, for most of them who had read the book, their reaction was a gigantic shrug. Why? I asked them.
 
Mostly, it seemed to boil down to the fact that they just weren’t all that invested in Cedric (aside from a vocal minority who said they actually cheered Edward Cullen’s death --- a reference to the actor who played Cedric also playing the lead vampire role in Twilight). There were several reasons for this: Cedric was in Hufflepuff house, not Gryffindor; he was one of Harry’s competitors in the Triwizard Tournament; and most tellingly, most of my scholars felt Rowling just hadn’t done much to develop the character or endear him to readers, so that when his end came, the response was mostly just a ‘meh.’ This, to me, is a weak point in that story (although far be it for a mere mortal such as myself to tell Jo how to write her immensely successful narrative). So there’s a lesson in this, I thought: make sure that any character you kill off is one that readers are heavily invested in. Otherwise, it’s just a waste of words and attempted dramatic effect.
 
Now, to be clear, I’m not talking about a Game of Thrones style wholesale killing off of characters, either, where there’s practically a revolving door of people meeting various and sundry messy ends.  In fact, I think an argument can be made against that, too, because characters are killed off so routinely, I know that I, for one, have become extremely wary about getting attached to any of them, good or bad. There’s no point: it’s only a matter of time before a given character, regardless of their morality or seeming importance to the narrative, gets snuffed, either in some rather off-handed manner or usually in some more spectacular fashion (read “bloody”). This, I would argue, makes for detached viewing/reading, which is Not A Good Thing. (Far be it for me to tell George how to write his immensely successful story, either... but it ain’t how I would do it. Just sayin’)
 
If you’re contemplating killing off a major character, I think you first need to examine why: is this moving the story forward, or are you just looking for cheap shocks ‘n thrills? Because audiences today are far more jaded about that sort of thing (witness my scholars’ reactions to Cedric’s demise), particularly if it seems unnecessary to the plot.
 
Second, if you’re going to all that effort of killing off a character, you might want to draw it out a little. Cedric’s death seems to occur suddenly and with very little buildup, and there’s not much afterwards because Harry is too busy fighting Voldemort. Yes, there’s some grieving later, when all the shouting and fireworks are over, but even then...
 
Third and perhaps most importantly, if this is to mean something in the greater scheme of things, you need to establish a real, personal and deep connection between your protagonist and the character getting killed, so that when it finally happens, the reader genuinely grieves along with the protagonist. (“I cared for that character! Their death is devastating to me, too!”) Establishing that connection is not a quick process in a story, any more than it is in real life.
 
Because you want your reader’s gorge to rim (rise) at news of that death... just like Hamlet’s did. Alas, poor Yorick!

0 Comments

Stop and Smell a Frickin' Rose or Two

5/1/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
We’re in one helluva hurry these days.
 
There’s a grim ruthlessness out there in the writing world: pundits of all sorts, famous and obscure, are urging writers to approach their work with the shiny, stainless steel precision of a heart surgeon. IT MUST ADVANCE THE PLOT, OR CUT IT OUT is their basic message. Remember those British posters of the First World War that showed an icily stern Lord Kitchener pointing his index figure at the viewer to shame or intimidate them (I’ve never been quite sure which) into joining the British Army? It’s as though we have those posters staring coldly at us wherever we go nowadays, with the message being that “they” feel we need to excise every last word that isn’t certifiably integral in the most vital way to moving the plot along.
 
To be fair, this is an attitude that permeates our entire society at just about every level. Everything has to be done on the double, because we’re in a hurry to get to the end... of the story... of the phone conversation (for those who still bother to use their phones to actually talk to someone)... of the text exchange... of the movie... of the Netflix series... and on and on. But maybe it’s time to get a little counter cultural here with a question:
 
Why? Are we trying for the literary equivalent of a 100 meter dash, or do we want to provide an experience?
 
If the former, then Mercutio’s speech in Romeo and Juliet about Queen Mab, the queen of dreams, has got to go. It really doesn’t advance the plot. It’s a point where all but my most diligent scholars glaze over and instinctively reach for their cell phones before they remember that I’ll confiscate said devices.
 
Tom Bombadil in Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings has got to go. He doesn’t advance the plot --- which is tossing the Ring into a live volcano --- one smidgeon. (Peter Jackson already figured that out, so Tom is nowhere to be found in the film.)
 
And there are many, many other examples in literature of things that really don’t advance the story. So the question is, why are they there? Why were they allowed to remain there?
 
Well, the answer is easy: they may not advance the story, but they make the story.
 
First, texture makes a world. Are we looking at mere cardboard cutouts of characters and places and events, or are we looking at people and locations and happenings that are/could be every bit as real as the folks and things that go on around us each and every day?
 
And second, it’s not a race, people. We’re there to savour the story of our protagonist, and the people and places he or she interacts with. Now, that’s not to say that we write everything, and keep everything we write. Goodness, no. I’m all too aware of Sir Arthur Quiller-Couch’s advice to “murder your darlings” (i.e. your words, all those soaring bits of prose you fell in love with as they leapt from the wellspring of your imagination onto the page). Nor should your story have the leisurely pace of a Victorian writer’s travel guide (unless you’re actually writing one). There’s a big difference between detail and turgidly bogged down.
 
 I usually start out each writing session by looking at what I wrote last session, and I’m getting better and better at cutting out unnecessary verbiage when I do (I hardly ever weep anymore, for example). A good deal of what we write doesn’t need to remain in from first to final draft.
 
But texture… detail… (well-written, anyway)… that’s a different matter.
 
The Old Forest and Tom Bombadil is a great and magical bit of storytelling: winding their way cautiously through this shaggy, hoary old forest, the hobbits’ encounter and near demise with Old Man Willow, Tom’s extremely timely appearance and amazing abilities, his wife Goldberry, his tales, his second rescue of the hobbits when they stray too near the Barrow Downs… man, that is a great chapter (or two) in a great book. I don’t think we should be overly zealous to cut out things like that.
 
Give your characters time to stop and smell a frickin’ rose or two. It’s not all about getting past Go and collecting $200, you know.

0 Comments

    D.R. Ranshaw's Blog

    Author of The Annals of Arrinor series.  Lover of great literature, fine wine, and chocolate. Not necessarily in that order.

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly