• Home
  • Blog
  • News
  • Events
  • About the Author
  • About the Book
  • Bookstore
  • Reviews
  • Press/Media
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Blog
  • News
  • Events
  • About the Author
  • About the Book
  • Bookstore
  • Reviews
  • Press/Media
  • Contact
D.R. Ranshaw

D.R. RANSHAW

Fame or Fidelity?

10/26/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
We writers are living oxymorons in many ways, you know. (Let me count the ways, oy… or better yet, let my long-suffering wife count the ways, from an objective observer’s perspective. Hmm. On second thought, let’s not.) I think most of us know this on an instinctive level, but it was brought to the fore when my wife and I sat down the other day and rewatched Saving Mr. Banks, the 2013 film chronicling the  early 1960s efforts of Walt Disney to make the film Mary Poppins from the books of P.L. Travers, the crusty British author who conceived the famous nanny. The film does an excellent job detailing the events, although apparently not always faithfully and/or accurately --- I used to constantly remind my students that Hollywood never lets the truth get in the way of telling a good story. But if we grant the film a generous dollop of historical/artistic licence, it works extremely well.
 
See, here’s the thing: writers will, by and large, tell you they write for themselves, they write because they have to --- really, a lot of variations on Isaac Asimov, one of science fiction’s towering giants (with, perhaps a towering ego to match; I read most of his autobiography --- two massive and rather self-indulgent volumes, if you please), who once said, “I write for the same reason I breathe --- because if I didn’t, I would die.” Which, I think, is all well and good, and even stripped of the hyperbole, largely true for most of us, including me. I write because I need to, have to. Particularly once I’ve started writing a story… it’s got to come out --- and in a timely manner, working on it diligently, not ignoring it --- because if I don’t, as Salman Rushdie has said, the story sulks.
 
But --- and here’s the first qualifier --- we don’t write only for ourselves: we want to share our work with others. We want fame and fortune. We want validation. Most of us want our words spread widely among the Horde of Voracious Readers out there; we want admiration/adulation… and maybe the means to live like J.K. Rowling. (Unless we’re weirdly reclusive hermits, like J.D. Salinger after the publication of Catcher in the Rye. Most writers tend to dream of literary fame… but once he had it, Salinger shunned it, with white-hot intensity.)
 
But --- and here’s the second qualifier, the one brought to mind from Saving Mr. Banks --- writers also don’t want to lose control of their progeny, particularly when adapting the work for either TV or movie theatre. We don’t want a nasty team of crass screenwriters taking our beloved characters and situations and transmuting them into something so foreign, so alien to our original story, that we recoil in horror and run screaming from the room. I rather suspect J.R.R. Tolkien, had he still been alive, would have been utterly horrified by what Peter Jackson did, first with The Lord of the Rings (LOTR) trilogy, then with The Hobbit --- perhaps especially with The Hobbit, where Jackson took a 19-chapter, 278-page book (at least in the Unwin edition I’ve had since I was twelve) and bloated it out to three enormous films, complete with all sorts of extraneous material --- and characters! --- not present in the original work. Again, I often pointed out to my students it was vital to keep in mind that Tolkien’s Middle Earth and Jackson’s Middle Earth are two very, very different places; and in many important regards, Tolkien’s tale, and Jackson’s tale, are quite, quite different stories. Saving Mr. Banks may not be totally accurate in its depiction of P.L. Travers’ reluctant horror about Disney taking her magical nanny and not merely giving her a spoonful of sugar, but stuffing her full of it, but I think it marvellously encapsulates the dilemma many writers have when confronted with such a scenario. (Kind of like Shylock crying out, “O my ducats! O my daughter!” What’s a hapless writer to do, for crying out loud?)
 
Not having had to face this conundrum (at least, not yet, anyway), I can only speculate on the answer, but I think it’s this: faced with the idea of greater recognition for the work versus… well, not… most writers will, ultimately, at least partially stifle the second qualifier above to allow the first qualifier to triumph. In other words, most writers will make their peace with certain changes to their literary child in order that it may reach a greater audience. Is this selling out? I don’t really know. Tolkien died long before Jackson’s films came along --- even long before Ralph Bakshi came out with his execrable animated version of LOTR in the late 1970s --- although Tolkien did sell the film rights to LOTR and The Hobbit before he died (for a pittance, apparently, especially given the multi-billion-dollar empire they’ve since spawned, but c’est la vie…).
 
It doesn’t, I guess, necessarily have to come to this Faustian deal with the devil that Saving Mr. Banks portrays. For example, George R.R. Martin, Diana Gabaldon, and J.K. Rowling have all, to varying degrees, been involved in the transmutation of their printed works to the screen, and one assumes, in the absence of anything contrary, they’re happy with the results --- Martin especially, seeing as how he was one of the creative Grand Poohbahs of the Game of Thrones TV series. Gabaldon is listed as a creative consultant on the Outlander series, which can mean anything from being deeply involved to just paying lip service to the creator’s ideas. Indeed, in rare cases, it can lead --- and here I drop my voice to a furtive whisper --- to better stories. Frank Darabont took the Stephen King novels The Shawshank Redemption and The Green Mile, made them into films, and the films --- it pains me as a writer to have to say this, but I think it’s true --- were actually better than the original King stories.
 
So… it’s an interesting dilemma/conundrum for a writer.
 
But… there’s part of me that also thinks it would be a delightful dilemma to have.
 
In some ways.
 
 
 
 
 
 

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    D.R. Ranshaw's Blog

    Copyright 2015-2025. All rights reserved.
    ​
    Author of The Annals of Arrinor series.  Lover of great literature, fine wine, and chocolate. Not necessarily in that order.

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly